<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 395 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168522</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Revision Petition, setting aside the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty to 10,000. The Court reinstated the original penalty amount of 1,81,462 as imposed by the lower authorities, emphasizing the statutory provisions and limitations on reducing penalties below the prescribed minimum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 395 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168522</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Revision Petition, setting aside the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty to 10,000. The Court reinstated the original penalty amount of 1,81,462 as imposed by the lower authorities, emphasizing the statutory provisions and limitations on reducing penalties below the prescribed minimum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>