<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 330 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257394</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the Revenue, directing the appellant to deposit 10% of the duty within eight weeks, with the balance dues waived upon deposit. Failure to comply would result in the dismissal of the appeal. The case underscores the significance of accurate Customs duty payment, importer liability in instances of non-payment by Clearing House Agents, and the Tribunal&#039;s authority to mandate pre-deposit for appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:07:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 330 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257394</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the Revenue, directing the appellant to deposit 10% of the duty within eight weeks, with the balance dues waived upon deposit. Failure to comply would result in the dismissal of the appeal. The case underscores the significance of accurate Customs duty payment, importer liability in instances of non-payment by Clearing House Agents, and the Tribunal&#039;s authority to mandate pre-deposit for appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>