<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 326 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257390</link>
    <description>The petition under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for a Scheme of Amalgamation involving three companies was granted sanction by the High Court. The Scheme was approved by shareholders and creditors, with no objections raised. The Regional Director and Official Liquidator supported the Scheme, emphasizing compliance with regulatory guidelines and employee benefits. The court directed the companies to fulfill statutory requirements, transfer assets to the Transferee Company, and dissolve the Transferor Company without winding up. The order specified the need for compliance with stamp duty and legal requirements, with the Petitioner Companies agreeing to deposit funds voluntarily.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 326 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257390</link>
      <description>The petition under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for a Scheme of Amalgamation involving three companies was granted sanction by the High Court. The Scheme was approved by shareholders and creditors, with no objections raised. The Regional Director and Official Liquidator supported the Scheme, emphasizing compliance with regulatory guidelines and employee benefits. The court directed the companies to fulfill statutory requirements, transfer assets to the Transferee Company, and dissolve the Transferor Company without winding up. The order specified the need for compliance with stamp duty and legal requirements, with the Petitioner Companies agreeing to deposit funds voluntarily.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>