<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 322 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257386</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, ruling that the loss incurred in a new business activity should be treated as revenue expenditure. The Court emphasized that the loss was attributable to the existing business activity and not a separate venture, following the principles outlined in a previous Gujarat High Court case. It highlighted the importance of distinguishing between expenses related to existing business enhancements and those associated with new ventures when classifying expenditure as revenue or capital.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 322 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257386</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, ruling that the loss incurred in a new business activity should be treated as revenue expenditure. The Court emphasized that the loss was attributable to the existing business activity and not a separate venture, following the principles outlined in a previous Gujarat High Court case. It highlighted the importance of distinguishing between expenses related to existing business enhancements and those associated with new ventures when classifying expenditure as revenue or capital.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>