<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (3) TMI 20 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168513</link>
    <description>A taxpayer&#039;s contribution towards a special bonus paid to employees of a managed company was held deductible as business expenditure because it was incurred on grounds of commercial expediency and to protect and enhance the taxpayer&#039;s own profits. Although the payment was not mandated by the managing agency agreement, it formed part of the profit-making process since the taxpayer&#039;s commission depended on the managed company&#039;s profits. The deduction was allowed as expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and there was no duplication with the allowance for reasonable bonus under Section 10(2)(x).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (3) TMI 20 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168513</link>
      <description>A taxpayer&#039;s contribution towards a special bonus paid to employees of a managed company was held deductible as business expenditure because it was incurred on grounds of commercial expediency and to protect and enhance the taxpayer&#039;s own profits. Although the payment was not mandated by the managing agency agreement, it formed part of the profit-making process since the taxpayer&#039;s commission depended on the managed company&#039;s profits. The deduction was allowed as expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and there was no duplication with the allowance for reasonable bonus under Section 10(2)(x).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>