<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (3) TMI 61 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168507</link>
    <description>Transfer of a firm&#039;s assets to a newly formed company controlled by the same persons is not a sale for the second proviso to section 10(2)(vii) where it merely reorganises the same business in a different legal form. Although the firm and company are separate legal entities, tax treatment depends on the transaction&#039;s real commercial substance. The provision applies only to a genuine sale involving profit-making in substance; a transferor cannot realise such profit by transferring assets within the same underlying ownership structure. Consequently, excess over written-down value does not become taxable merely because of the restructuring.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:20:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (3) TMI 61 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168507</link>
      <description>Transfer of a firm&#039;s assets to a newly formed company controlled by the same persons is not a sale for the second proviso to section 10(2)(vii) where it merely reorganises the same business in a different legal form. Although the firm and company are separate legal entities, tax treatment depends on the transaction&#039;s real commercial substance. The provision applies only to a genuine sale involving profit-making in substance; a transferor cannot realise such profit by transferring assets within the same underlying ownership structure. Consequently, excess over written-down value does not become taxable merely because of the restructuring.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>