https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168496 Article 194(3) legislative privileges must operate consistently with the constitutional protections of personal liberty and judicial review under Articles 21, 32 and 226. Legislative committal for contempt or breach of privilege remains open to habeas corpus review where detention legality is challenged, and High Courts may grant interim protection incidental to that jurisdiction. Bona fide invocation, presentation and judicial consideration of such remedies do not constitute legislative contempt. A Legislature cannot require Judges or advocates to be produced in custody, or initiate contempt proceedings against them, for judicial acts performed within constitutional jurisdiction. Interim orders preserving liberty pending adjudication may validly restrain implementation of impugned legislative action. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 13:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168496 Article 194(3) legislative privileges must operate consistently with the constitutional protections of personal liberty and judicial review under Articles 21, 32 and 226. Legislative committal for contempt or breach of privilege remains open to habeas corpus review where detention legality is challenged, and High Courts may grant interim protection incidental to that jurisdiction. Bona fide invocation, presentation and judicial consideration of such remedies do not constitute legislative contempt. A Legislature cannot require Judges or advocates to be produced in custody, or initiate contempt proceedings against them, for judicial acts performed within constitutional jurisdiction. Interim orders preserving liberty pending adjudication may validly restrain implementation of impugned legislative action. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168496