https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168496 Legislative privilege under Article 194(3) does not exclude judicial scrutiny of a committal affecting personal liberty, and must be read consistently with Articles 21, 32 and 226. The article explains that a High Court may entertain habeas corpus relief and grant interim protection where detention is challenged, even if the detention arises from a legislative sentence for contempt or breach of privilege. It further states that bona fide resort to constitutional remedies, and judicial orders made within jurisdiction, are not contempt of the Legislature. It also notes that the Legislature cannot direct custody or proceedings against judges or counsel for acts done in judicial duty, and cannot treat a judge's exercise of constitutional jurisdiction as contempt. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jun 2025 15:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168496 Legislative privilege under Article 194(3) does not exclude judicial scrutiny of a committal affecting personal liberty, and must be read consistently with Articles 21, 32 and 226. The article explains that a High Court may entertain habeas corpus relief and grant interim protection where detention is challenged, even if the detention arises from a legislative sentence for contempt or breach of privilege. It further states that bona fide resort to constitutional remedies, and judicial orders made within jurisdiction, are not contempt of the Legislature. It also notes that the Legislature cannot direct custody or proceedings against judges or counsel for acts done in judicial duty, and cannot treat a judge's exercise of constitutional jurisdiction as contempt. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168496