https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168492 A tenant protected by the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act retained a heritable interest after termination of the contractual tenancy, so the heirs could continue the appeal and the matter did not abate. Payment of arrears by cheque was a valid tender where the Act required timely payment and no contrary agreement or circumstance showed that cash alone was required, so default-based eviction could not stand on that ground. In second appeal, interference with a lower appellate finding on bona fide requirement was justified because material evidence on the landlord's need and financial capacity had been ignored; the dismissal of the suit was ultimately upheld. en-us Fri, 07 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:49:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168492 A tenant protected by the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act retained a heritable interest after termination of the contractual tenancy, so the heirs could continue the appeal and the matter did not abate. Payment of arrears by cheque was a valid tender where the Act required timely payment and no contrary agreement or circumstance showed that cash alone was required, so default-based eviction could not stand on that ground. In second appeal, interference with a lower appellate finding on bona fide requirement was justified because material evidence on the landlord's need and financial capacity had been ignored; the dismissal of the suit was ultimately upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168492