https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257366 The writ court should not direct release of seized goods merely on payment of tax where a compounding notice is pending and the dealer's reply has not been considered. The authority must first examine the representation and pass a final order in accordance with law, because liability for compounding fee may still arise and recovery may be difficult if the dealer remains unregistered. The direction for release of goods was therefore set aside, and the matter was remitted for a final decision on the compounding notice after considering the dealer's reply. en-us Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:14:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257366 The writ court should not direct release of seized goods merely on payment of tax where a compounding notice is pending and the dealer's reply has not been considered. The authority must first examine the representation and pass a final order in accordance with law, because liability for compounding fee may still arise and recovery may be difficult if the dealer remains unregistered. The direction for release of goods was therefore set aside, and the matter was remitted for a final decision on the compounding notice after considering the dealer's reply. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257366