<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 296 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257360</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal affirmed the classification of the product as &quot;Other Mastics,&quot; excluded from Section 4A, and upheld duty calculation based on the transaction value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and the Cross Objections were disposed of accordingly, confirming the decision to assess duty on the product under Section 4.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 296 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257360</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal affirmed the classification of the product as &quot;Other Mastics,&quot; excluded from Section 4A, and upheld duty calculation based on the transaction value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and the Cross Objections were disposed of accordingly, confirming the decision to assess duty on the product under Section 4.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>