<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 292 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257356</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to predeposit Rs. 1,20,000 within eight weeks towards the total interest amount of Rs. 6,27,921 due to erroneous availment of CENVAT credit. The remaining balance was waived upon such deposit, and the recovery of the waived amount was stayed pending the appeal process. The Tribunal found that the appellant had not established a strong case for a full waiver of interest and agreed to examine the time-bar contention during the final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 292 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257356</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to predeposit Rs. 1,20,000 within eight weeks towards the total interest amount of Rs. 6,27,921 due to erroneous availment of CENVAT credit. The remaining balance was waived upon such deposit, and the recovery of the waived amount was stayed pending the appeal process. The Tribunal found that the appellant had not established a strong case for a full waiver of interest and agreed to examine the time-bar contention during the final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>