https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257346 The court dismissed the petition seeking a refund of the purchase price due to misdescription of property area in the sale notice. The petitioners purchased a property based on an advertised area but failed to verify it before bidding. Despite provisions allowing inspection and seeking clarification, they did not do so. The court emphasized the principle of "as is where is" and "as is what is," placing responsibility on the purchaser to verify details before bidding. As the petitioners neglected their rights by not inspecting the property, the court found no merit in their claim and dismissed the petition. en-us Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257346 The court dismissed the petition seeking a refund of the purchase price due to misdescription of property area in the sale notice. The petitioners purchased a property based on an advertised area but failed to verify it before bidding. Despite provisions allowing inspection and seeking clarification, they did not do so. The court emphasized the principle of "as is where is" and "as is what is," placing responsibility on the purchaser to verify details before bidding. As the petitioners neglected their rights by not inspecting the property, the court found no merit in their claim and dismissed the petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257346