<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 277 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257341</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed that gains from the sale of land were correctly classified as long-term capital gains, not business profit. The disallowance of development expenses exceeding Rs. 2.00 lakhs was upheld due to insufficient evidence of trading activity. The Court emphasized the transaction resembled capital investment realization, not a trade venture, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Case (Appeal).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 06:05:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 277 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257341</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed that gains from the sale of land were correctly classified as long-term capital gains, not business profit. The disallowance of development expenses exceeding Rs. 2.00 lakhs was upheld due to insufficient evidence of trading activity. The Court emphasized the transaction resembled capital investment realization, not a trade venture, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Case (Appeal).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>