https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257340 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking a mandamus to stay the entire disputed outstanding demand of Rs. 10,00,00,000. The court held that the first respondent had exercised discretion judiciously by granting a partial stay of Rs. 5,00,00,000 and found no reason to interfere with this decision. Additionally, the court refused to grant an interim injunction restraining the respondents from taking coercive action in recovering the demand pending disposal of the appeal by the CIT (A), emphasizing that the discretionary power under Section 220(6) should be exercised based on relevant grounds and not arbitrarily. en-us Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257340 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking a mandamus to stay the entire disputed outstanding demand of Rs. 10,00,00,000. The court held that the first respondent had exercised discretion judiciously by granting a partial stay of Rs. 5,00,00,000 and found no reason to interfere with this decision. Additionally, the court refused to grant an interim injunction restraining the respondents from taking coercive action in recovering the demand pending disposal of the appeal by the CIT (A), emphasizing that the discretionary power under Section 220(6) should be exercised based on relevant grounds and not arbitrarily. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257340