<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 261 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257325</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order under section 263, determining that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest due to the lack of inquiry into the commencement of the business and the allowability of expenses. The appeal was dismissed, and the AO was instructed to re-examine the issues after granting the appellant an opportunity. The tribunal clarified that issuing multiple notices under section 263 does not invalidate the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 06:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 261 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257325</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order under section 263, determining that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest due to the lack of inquiry into the commencement of the business and the allowability of expenses. The appeal was dismissed, and the AO was instructed to re-examine the issues after granting the appellant an opportunity. The tribunal clarified that issuing multiple notices under section 263 does not invalidate the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>