<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 253 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257317</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant on all issues. It held that fixing stacks to the Industrial Alternators did not amount to manufacturing, as the activity was undertaken under job work provisions. The duty imposed on the appellant was not justified, considering the movement of goods under job work Challan. The Tribunal also allowed the appellant&#039;s request to dispense with the pre-deposit of duty, granting an unconditional stay and providing relief in that regard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:14:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 253 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257317</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant on all issues. It held that fixing stacks to the Industrial Alternators did not amount to manufacturing, as the activity was undertaken under job work provisions. The duty imposed on the appellant was not justified, considering the movement of goods under job work Challan. The Tribunal also allowed the appellant&#039;s request to dispense with the pre-deposit of duty, granting an unconditional stay and providing relief in that regard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>