<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 252 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257316</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the appellant EOU. The decision was based on the precedent established in an earlier judgment, maintaining consistency in interpreting the law on the discharge of Special Additional Duty (SAD) by EOUs on goods transferred to sister units in the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 252 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257316</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the appellant EOU. The decision was based on the precedent established in an earlier judgment, maintaining consistency in interpreting the law on the discharge of Special Additional Duty (SAD) by EOUs on goods transferred to sister units in the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>