<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 251 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257315</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the distinction between export and deemed export, as there is no legal basis for such differentiation. The Commissioner (Appeals) reasoned that deemed export and export are not different, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 251 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257315</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the distinction between export and deemed export, as there is no legal basis for such differentiation. The Commissioner (Appeals) reasoned that deemed export and export are not different, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>