<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 245 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257309</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Appellant to make a pre-deposit of a specified amount within a stipulated timeframe, with the balance of dues waived upon compliance. The recovery of the remaining dues was stayed during the pendency of the appeal, based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings regarding the eligibility for exemption under the notifications and the application of CENVAT credit rules to imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:06:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 245 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257309</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Appellant to make a pre-deposit of a specified amount within a stipulated timeframe, with the balance of dues waived upon compliance. The recovery of the remaining dues was stayed during the pendency of the appeal, based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings regarding the eligibility for exemption under the notifications and the application of CENVAT credit rules to imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>