<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 222 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257286</link>
    <description>Production expenses incurred for film production, whose genuineness was not questioned and for which no specific unverifiable items were identified, warranted only a limited ad hoc disallowance of cash expenses. Payments to a Thailand-based entity for overseas shooting were not taxable in India where it had no Indian permanent establishment and the services were rendered abroad; consequently, no tax deduction obligation or disallowance for non-deduction arose. Similarly, modelling fees for services performed in Nepal were not taxable in India under the applicable treaty&#039;s specific services provisions, and the residual article could not apply. Penalty required consequential recomputation after quantum relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 09:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 222 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257286</link>
      <description>Production expenses incurred for film production, whose genuineness was not questioned and for which no specific unverifiable items were identified, warranted only a limited ad hoc disallowance of cash expenses. Payments to a Thailand-based entity for overseas shooting were not taxable in India where it had no Indian permanent establishment and the services were rendered abroad; consequently, no tax deduction obligation or disallowance for non-deduction arose. Similarly, modelling fees for services performed in Nepal were not taxable in India under the applicable treaty&#039;s specific services provisions, and the residual article could not apply. Penalty required consequential recomputation after quantum relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>