https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257272 The appeal was filed against the Order-in-Original confirming a Central Excise demand of Rs. 1,46,83,687 for the period 2007-2008 to 2011-2012, along with interest and penalties under Cenvat Credit Rule 2004. The appellants, engaged in manufacturing safety shoes, handling gloves, and work wears, failed to comply with Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, leading to the order against them. Despite arguments, the appellants were required to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 75 lakhs within a specified deadline, with recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. Failure to comply would result in appeal dismissal for pre-deposit default. en-us Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Mar 2015 05:45:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257272 The appeal was filed against the Order-in-Original confirming a Central Excise demand of Rs. 1,46,83,687 for the period 2007-2008 to 2011-2012, along with interest and penalties under Cenvat Credit Rule 2004. The appellants, engaged in manufacturing safety shoes, handling gloves, and work wears, failed to comply with Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, leading to the order against them. Despite arguments, the appellants were required to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 75 lakhs within a specified deadline, with recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. Failure to comply would result in appeal dismissal for pre-deposit default. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257272