<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 206 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257270</link>
    <description>Duty on TOW arising during manufacture of polyester staple fibre and polyester staple yarn was treated as unsustainable because the exemption scheme for the relevant period was later amended retrospectively to extend coverage to TOW. The Tribunal considered that amendment as reflecting the intended scope of the exemption for the period in dispute, so the demand could not be upheld. On that basis, the impugned order was liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2015 08:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 206 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257270</link>
      <description>Duty on TOW arising during manufacture of polyester staple fibre and polyester staple yarn was treated as unsustainable because the exemption scheme for the relevant period was later amended retrospectively to extend coverage to TOW. The Tribunal considered that amendment as reflecting the intended scope of the exemption for the period in dispute, so the demand could not be upheld. On that basis, the impugned order was liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>