<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 199 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257263</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; arguments on the time limitation for the review order, the power of the Commissioner (Appeals) to remand the matter, and the impact of paid service tax on customs duty. It directed the original authority to scrutinize the expenditures in detail to determine their nexus to the import value under Customs Valuation Rules. The tribunal emphasized that customs duty assessment is distinct from service tax obligations. Consequently, the matter was remanded for further examination, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2015 05:44:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 199 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257263</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; arguments on the time limitation for the review order, the power of the Commissioner (Appeals) to remand the matter, and the impact of paid service tax on customs duty. It directed the original authority to scrutinize the expenditures in detail to determine their nexus to the import value under Customs Valuation Rules. The tribunal emphasized that customs duty assessment is distinct from service tax obligations. Consequently, the matter was remanded for further examination, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>