<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 192 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257256</link>
    <description>Applicability of disallowance for expenditure attributable to exempt income was contested: ITAT affirmed that disallowance cannot be invoked where the assessee did not receive exempt income and the revenue failed to rebut that finding, so the AO erred in applying allocation-based adjustments to interest and similar payments; outcome: deletion of the disallowance in favour of the assessee. The tribunal relied on earlier judicial authority holding that absence of a claim or receipt of exempt income precludes the operation of allocation rules, and recorded that the assessing officer&#039;s invocation of the allocation mechanism was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 15:55:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 192 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257256</link>
      <description>Applicability of disallowance for expenditure attributable to exempt income was contested: ITAT affirmed that disallowance cannot be invoked where the assessee did not receive exempt income and the revenue failed to rebut that finding, so the AO erred in applying allocation-based adjustments to interest and similar payments; outcome: deletion of the disallowance in favour of the assessee. The tribunal relied on earlier judicial authority holding that absence of a claim or receipt of exempt income precludes the operation of allocation rules, and recorded that the assessing officer&#039;s invocation of the allocation mechanism was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>