<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Old practice of Government-High Court Decision undone!!</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6143</link>
    <description>The Explanation inserted into Rule 5 defines &quot;export goods&quot; as goods to be taken out of India, thereby excluding deemed exports from refund entitlement under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. This amendment overrides prior judicial interpretations that had allowed refunds for deemed exports and clearances to 100% EOUs effected against bond debits, and raises questions about retrospective application and consequent litigation risk.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2015 05:40:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2015 05:40:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Old practice of Government-High Court Decision undone!!</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6143</link>
      <description>The Explanation inserted into Rule 5 defines &quot;export goods&quot; as goods to be taken out of India, thereby excluding deemed exports from refund entitlement under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. This amendment overrides prior judicial interpretations that had allowed refunds for deemed exports and clearances to 100% EOUs effected against bond debits, and raises questions about retrospective application and consequent litigation risk.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Cenvat Credit</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2015 05:40:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>