https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257231 The Tribunal denied the applicant's request to modify the stay order based on under valuation of goods and financial hardship. Despite acknowledging the financial difficulties claimed by the applicant, the Tribunal refused to accept new documents as evidence in the modification application. The Tribunal extended the compliance period by six weeks but warned of dismissal if the conditions were not met. The decision underscores the importance of presenting all relevant evidence during adjudication and following procedural rules when seeking modifications to stay orders. en-us Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257231 The Tribunal denied the applicant's request to modify the stay order based on under valuation of goods and financial hardship. Despite acknowledging the financial difficulties claimed by the applicant, the Tribunal refused to accept new documents as evidence in the modification application. The Tribunal extended the compliance period by six weeks but warned of dismissal if the conditions were not met. The decision underscores the importance of presenting all relevant evidence during adjudication and following procedural rules when seeking modifications to stay orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257231