<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 648 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168474</link>
    <description>A statutory disqualification under Section 14(1)(J-2) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act was construed to apply to persons already holding office when the amendment commenced. The Court reasoned that a disqualifying provision is not subject to an inflexible presumption of prospectivity; where the language and legislative intent indicate application to sitting members, effect must be given to that command. On that construction, no vested right existed to continue in office despite the new disability, and the disqualification was upheld against the incumbent member.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 648 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168474</link>
      <description>A statutory disqualification under Section 14(1)(J-2) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act was construed to apply to persons already holding office when the amendment commenced. The Court reasoned that a disqualifying provision is not subject to an inflexible presumption of prospectivity; where the language and legislative intent indicate application to sitting members, effect must be given to that command. On that construction, no vested right existed to continue in office despite the new disability, and the disqualification was upheld against the incumbent member.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>