<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (3) TMI 60 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168471</link>
    <description>A trust remains charitable where the deed shows a dominant charitable intention and the income is accumulated before later application to scholarships, medical relief, aid to the poor, and relief in calamities. Investment of the accumulated income in shares was only a mode of administration and did not alter the charitable character of the property. A discretionary preference for employees of the associated company did not create a closed private trust, because the trustees were still free to apply the bounty within the charitable objects. The trust property was therefore treated as held wholly for charitable purposes, and the income was exempt from tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:52:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (3) TMI 60 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168471</link>
      <description>A trust remains charitable where the deed shows a dominant charitable intention and the income is accumulated before later application to scholarships, medical relief, aid to the poor, and relief in calamities. Investment of the accumulated income in shares was only a mode of administration and did not alter the charitable character of the property. A discretionary preference for employees of the associated company did not create a closed private trust, because the trustees were still free to apply the bounty within the charitable objects. The trust property was therefore treated as held wholly for charitable purposes, and the income was exempt from tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>