https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168466 Forwarding an application to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate in relation to a pending section 145 proceeding, when done in the ordinary course of official duty, did not amount to contempt because it showed no real or substantial interference with the administration of justice. The Supreme Court also treated the District Magistrate's transmission of the matter for report as a proper exercise of supervisory power under section 528, since calling for the court's remarks and declining to act after the allegations proved baseless was administratively regular. The contempt proceedings were therefore misconceived and the conviction could not stand. en-us Thu, 05 Feb 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:20:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168466 Forwarding an application to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate in relation to a pending section 145 proceeding, when done in the ordinary course of official duty, did not amount to contempt because it showed no real or substantial interference with the administration of justice. The Supreme Court also treated the District Magistrate's transmission of the matter for report as a proper exercise of supervisory power under section 528, since calling for the court's remarks and declining to act after the allegations proved baseless was administratively regular. The contempt proceedings were therefore misconceived and the conviction could not stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Feb 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168466