<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 136 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257200</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals seeking to set aside orders by the Commissioner (Appeals) for refund of service tax, emphasizing the Commissioner&#039;s authority to remand for quantification. Despite challenges to the remand power, the Tribunal upheld it, allowing the original authority to issue refund cheques post quantification. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the remand direction for refund processing based on nexus between input and output services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 11:05:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 136 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257200</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals seeking to set aside orders by the Commissioner (Appeals) for refund of service tax, emphasizing the Commissioner&#039;s authority to remand for quantification. Despite challenges to the remand power, the Tribunal upheld it, allowing the original authority to issue refund cheques post quantification. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the remand direction for refund processing based on nexus between input and output services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>