<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 135 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257199</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demands for Convention Services and Outdoor Catering Service, upholding penalties under Sections 76 and 77, and modifying the penalty under Section 78 to align with the confirmed service tax amount. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the nature of services provided were countered with evidence from invoices and documents, leading to the validation of the demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 135 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257199</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demands for Convention Services and Outdoor Catering Service, upholding penalties under Sections 76 and 77, and modifying the penalty under Section 78 to align with the confirmed service tax amount. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the nature of services provided were countered with evidence from invoices and documents, leading to the validation of the demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>