<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (12) TMI 20 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168462</link>
    <description>A statutory transfer of unpaid accumulations to a Labour Welfare Fund was held unconstitutional because the employer&#039;s liability to employees was not extinguished, the debt remained outstanding despite limitation, and the scheme deprived the employer of property without compensation. The argument based on frustration and abandoned property also failed, as there was no mechanism to protect the true owners&#039; claims before vesting. By contrast, the provision requiring fines realised from employees to be paid into the Fund was upheld because those sums were already impressed with a trust for employees and the employer had no beneficial interest in them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (12) TMI 20 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168462</link>
      <description>A statutory transfer of unpaid accumulations to a Labour Welfare Fund was held unconstitutional because the employer&#039;s liability to employees was not extinguished, the debt remained outstanding despite limitation, and the scheme deprived the employer of property without compensation. The argument based on frustration and abandoned property also failed, as there was no mechanism to protect the true owners&#039; claims before vesting. By contrast, the provision requiring fines realised from employees to be paid into the Fund was upheld because those sums were already impressed with a trust for employees and the employer had no beneficial interest in them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>