<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 116 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257180</link>
    <description>Disputed customs valuation weakened the importer&#039;s claim for complete waiver of pre-deposit because the declared value of brass goods was lower than the contemporaneous value of brass scrap, and the supplier&#039;s purchase invoices from manufacturers were not produced. On that factual basis, the appellant failed to show a strong prima facie case for full stay of recovery, and the pre-deposit already made during investigation was treated as insufficient to protect the Revenue&#039;s interest. The appellant was therefore required to deposit a further amount within the stipulated time, and the balance demand, interest, and penalty would remain stayed only on compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 05:56:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 116 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257180</link>
      <description>Disputed customs valuation weakened the importer&#039;s claim for complete waiver of pre-deposit because the declared value of brass goods was lower than the contemporaneous value of brass scrap, and the supplier&#039;s purchase invoices from manufacturers were not produced. On that factual basis, the appellant failed to show a strong prima facie case for full stay of recovery, and the pre-deposit already made during investigation was treated as insufficient to protect the Revenue&#039;s interest. The appellant was therefore required to deposit a further amount within the stipulated time, and the balance demand, interest, and penalty would remain stayed only on compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>