<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 109 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257173</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled on the interpretation of the activities carried out by the assessee for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that activities beyond core banking functions, such as collecting electricity bills and providing services under government schemes, were eligible for deduction. The court dismissed the Income Tax Appeals, affirming that these additional activities qualified for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 May 2017 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 109 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257173</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled on the interpretation of the activities carried out by the assessee for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that activities beyond core banking functions, such as collecting electricity bills and providing services under government schemes, were eligible for deduction. The court dismissed the Income Tax Appeals, affirming that these additional activities qualified for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>