<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 107 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257171</link>
    <description>Undervaluation-based additions could not be sustained where the recorded compromise, continued non-conveyance of title, and later dispute among legal representatives explained the purchaser&#039;s subsequent payment. The valuation dispute had to rest on objective material, and suspicion arising only from the later conveyance date was insufficient. The Tribunal&#039;s conclusion that the Assessing Officer&#039;s and DVO-based additions lacked adequate evidentiary support was upheld in law, and no substantial question of law arose. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the assessment additions were not restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 09:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 107 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257171</link>
      <description>Undervaluation-based additions could not be sustained where the recorded compromise, continued non-conveyance of title, and later dispute among legal representatives explained the purchaser&#039;s subsequent payment. The valuation dispute had to rest on objective material, and suspicion arising only from the later conveyance date was insufficient. The Tribunal&#039;s conclusion that the Assessing Officer&#039;s and DVO-based additions lacked adequate evidentiary support was upheld in law, and no substantial question of law arose. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the assessment additions were not restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>