<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 539 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168454</link>
    <description>Property allotted to a Hindu widow in recognition of a pre-existing right to maintenance is treated as falling within Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which enlarges a limited interest into absolute ownership. Section 14(2) applies only where the instrument creates a new and independent title for the first time, and not where it merely acknowledges an existing right. Restrictions on alienation in the will do not prevent enlargement under Section 14(1) once the widow is in possession on the Act&#039;s commencement. The widow&#039;s interest therefore became absolute, and the restraint on alienation did not continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:29:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 539 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168454</link>
      <description>Property allotted to a Hindu widow in recognition of a pre-existing right to maintenance is treated as falling within Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which enlarges a limited interest into absolute ownership. Section 14(2) applies only where the instrument creates a new and independent title for the first time, and not where it merely acknowledges an existing right. Restrictions on alienation in the will do not prevent enlargement under Section 14(1) once the widow is in possession on the Act&#039;s commencement. The widow&#039;s interest therefore became absolute, and the restraint on alienation did not continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>