<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (3) TMI 156 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168452</link>
    <description>Property allotted to a Hindu widow in satisfaction of a pre-existing right to maintenance was treated as property acquired in recognition of an existing claim, not as a fresh grant. Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act was construed broadly to enlarge a female Hindu&#039;s estate into absolute ownership when she is in possession, including property received in lieu of maintenance. Section 14(2) was confined to instruments that create a new title for the first time and did not apply where the compromise merely recorded the widow&#039;s legal position. A restriction on alienation in the compromise did not defeat the operation of section 14(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 13:21:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (3) TMI 156 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168452</link>
      <description>Property allotted to a Hindu widow in satisfaction of a pre-existing right to maintenance was treated as property acquired in recognition of an existing claim, not as a fresh grant. Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act was construed broadly to enlarge a female Hindu&#039;s estate into absolute ownership when she is in possession, including property received in lieu of maintenance. Section 14(2) was confined to instruments that create a new title for the first time and did not apply where the compromise merely recorded the widow&#039;s legal position. A restriction on alienation in the compromise did not defeat the operation of section 14(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>