https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168449 The Supreme Court scrutinized the legitimacy of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) emphasizing that PIL should genuinely serve public interest, not personal vendettas or political motives. The Court found irregularities in land allotments but gave the State the benefit of doubt regarding malafides. Criticizing the High Court for not following principles of natural justice, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and directed a fresh consideration, allowing parties to present additional material within four weeks without expressing an opinion on the case's merits. en-us Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Nov 2015 21:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168449 The Supreme Court scrutinized the legitimacy of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) emphasizing that PIL should genuinely serve public interest, not personal vendettas or political motives. The Court found irregularities in land allotments but gave the State the benefit of doubt regarding malafides. Criticizing the High Court for not following principles of natural justice, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and directed a fresh consideration, allowing parties to present additional material within four weeks without expressing an opinion on the case's merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168449