<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 86 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257150</link>
    <description>A prima facie case against the service tax demand was found where bus owners supplied buses with drivers for fixed routes, a activity treated in earlier matters as outside rent-a-cab service. In that context, rejection of the appeal solely for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was considered improper, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits without insisting on pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 07:57:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 86 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257150</link>
      <description>A prima facie case against the service tax demand was found where bus owners supplied buses with drivers for fixed routes, a activity treated in earlier matters as outside rent-a-cab service. In that context, rejection of the appeal solely for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was considered improper, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits without insisting on pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>