https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257149 The Madras HC noted that writ interference was unwarranted where the Tamil Nadu VAT Act provided an effective statutory scheme of revision and rectification, including a further remedy in appropriate cases and opportunity requirements where enhancement was involved. Because the dispute depended on the applicability of the statutory provisions and alternative remedies remained available, the impugned order was left undisturbed and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory route. The court also held that the matter did not fall within the provision concerning an identical question of law pending in another proceeding, and the pendency of a similar issue elsewhere did not justify writ relief on the facts. en-us Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257149 The Madras HC noted that writ interference was unwarranted where the Tamil Nadu VAT Act provided an effective statutory scheme of revision and rectification, including a further remedy in appropriate cases and opportunity requirements where enhancement was involved. Because the dispute depended on the applicability of the statutory provisions and alternative remedies remained available, the impugned order was left undisturbed and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory route. The court also held that the matter did not fall within the provision concerning an identical question of law pending in another proceeding, and the pendency of a similar issue elsewhere did not justify writ relief on the facts. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257149