<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 80 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257144</link>
    <description>The Tribunal clarified that the &quot;cost of closing stock&quot; should be included in the final order&#039;s paragraph 7.4 regarding unabsorbed overheads, aligning with the decision&#039;s intent. This clarification ensures accuracy in determining the cost of production and upholds the applicant&#039;s favorable decision on the issue. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s objections and disposed of the applicant&#039;s miscellaneous application accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 80 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257144</link>
      <description>The Tribunal clarified that the &quot;cost of closing stock&quot; should be included in the final order&#039;s paragraph 7.4 regarding unabsorbed overheads, aligning with the decision&#039;s intent. This clarification ensures accuracy in determining the cost of production and upholds the applicant&#039;s favorable decision on the issue. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s objections and disposed of the applicant&#039;s miscellaneous application accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>