<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 70 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257134</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the additional conditionalities imposed by the subsequent Additional Commissioner. It was held that the subsequent Commissioner exceeded his authority by adding new conditions for the release of goods, which were not part of the original order. The Tribunal emphasized that the subsequent Commissioner did not have the power to alter the earlier order and that the additional conditionalities had no legal basis as they effectively modified the original order without proper authority. The decision focused solely on the issue of the subsequent Commissioner&#039;s overreach in modifying the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 70 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257134</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the additional conditionalities imposed by the subsequent Additional Commissioner. It was held that the subsequent Commissioner exceeded his authority by adding new conditions for the release of goods, which were not part of the original order. The Tribunal emphasized that the subsequent Commissioner did not have the power to alter the earlier order and that the additional conditionalities had no legal basis as they effectively modified the original order without proper authority. The decision focused solely on the issue of the subsequent Commissioner&#039;s overreach in modifying the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>