<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 60 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, totaling Rs. 30,16,897. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding fall in Gross Profit, disallowance of deductions under section 80IB, disallowance of depreciation, and deduction claimed under section 80IB. The penalties were deemed unjustified based on the appellant&#039;s arguments and relevant case law, leading to the deletion of the imposed penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 07:51:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 60 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, totaling Rs. 30,16,897. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding fall in Gross Profit, disallowance of deductions under section 80IB, disallowance of depreciation, and deduction claimed under section 80IB. The penalties were deemed unjustified based on the appellant&#039;s arguments and relevant case law, leading to the deletion of the imposed penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>