<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 58 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the incorrect invocation of section 14A, failure to meet statutory preconditions, and the absence of separate bank accounts for investments were considered. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to disallow 0.5% of the expenditure under section 14A, following a previous order setting a specific disallowance percentage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 58 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the incorrect invocation of section 14A, failure to meet statutory preconditions, and the absence of separate bank accounts for investments were considered. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to disallow 0.5% of the expenditure under section 14A, following a previous order setting a specific disallowance percentage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>