https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168445 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding possession of land L(1)(a) but allowed the amendment for L(1)(b), remanding the case for further trial. The Society was ordered to pay costs incurred by the plaintiff in the High Court and trial court. Each party would bear its own costs in the Supreme Court. The rate of mesne profits was determined, and the question of improvements would be reconsidered in light of the findings on the second Kuthakapattom lease. en-us Mon, 12 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:21:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168445 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding possession of land L(1)(a) but allowed the amendment for L(1)(b), remanding the case for further trial. The Society was ordered to pay costs incurred by the plaintiff in the High Court and trial court. Each party would bear its own costs in the Supreme Court. The rate of mesne profits was determined, and the question of improvements would be reconsidered in light of the findings on the second Kuthakapattom lease. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168445