https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168442 The appeals were dismissed by the Designated Court, Bombay, in a case involving accusations under IPC and TADA. The court rejected bail for the appellants based on evidence suggesting their involvement in creating terror and communal hatred. Despite the expiry of TADA, ongoing proceedings were upheld under the saving provision, emphasizing the continuation of legal actions. The court clarified the applicability of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act and highlighted the importance of timely bail applications, ruling that the appellants forfeited their right by not applying within the statutory period before the charge-sheet was filed. en-us Mon, 08 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Mar 2015 16:29:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168442 The appeals were dismissed by the Designated Court, Bombay, in a case involving accusations under IPC and TADA. The court rejected bail for the appellants based on evidence suggesting their involvement in creating terror and communal hatred. Despite the expiry of TADA, ongoing proceedings were upheld under the saving provision, emphasizing the continuation of legal actions. The court clarified the applicability of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act and highlighted the importance of timely bail applications, ruling that the appellants forfeited their right by not applying within the statutory period before the charge-sheet was filed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168442