<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (12) TMI 140 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168440</link>
    <description>The court confirmed the trial court&#039;s judgment for the refund of Rs. 3 lakhs, with interest, to prevent unjust enrichment. The cross-objection was dismissed, emphasizing the statutory charge under Section 55(6) of the Transfer of Property Act. The court held that readiness and willingness are prerequisites for specific performance and that earnest money is forfeited upon default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:32:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (12) TMI 140 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168440</link>
      <description>The court confirmed the trial court&#039;s judgment for the refund of Rs. 3 lakhs, with interest, to prevent unjust enrichment. The cross-objection was dismissed, emphasizing the statutory charge under Section 55(6) of the Transfer of Property Act. The court held that readiness and willingness are prerequisites for specific performance and that earnest money is forfeited upon default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>