<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 601 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168438</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the 1991 UGC Regulations, which introduced an eligibility test for lecturer appointments, and treated the related exemption for certain M.Phil. and Ph.D. candidates as a transitional measure protecting legitimate expectation under the earlier regime. The Court held that the 31 December 1993 cut-off date had a rational basis, was not arbitrary, and did not violate Article 14. It also ruled that the exemption had to be assessed by reference to the date of the regulatory change, not the date of the recruitment advertisement, so the High Court could not extend the benefit up to 31 December 1994. The specific relief for respondents who independently met the amended cut-off was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 12:49:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 601 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168438</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the 1991 UGC Regulations, which introduced an eligibility test for lecturer appointments, and treated the related exemption for certain M.Phil. and Ph.D. candidates as a transitional measure protecting legitimate expectation under the earlier regime. The Court held that the 31 December 1993 cut-off date had a rational basis, was not arbitrary, and did not violate Article 14. It also ruled that the exemption had to be assessed by reference to the date of the regulatory change, not the date of the recruitment advertisement, so the High Court could not extend the benefit up to 31 December 1994. The specific relief for respondents who independently met the amended cut-off was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>