<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 33 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257097</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to claim Cenvat Credit on welding electrodes used for repairs and maintenance of plant and machinery. The decision emphasized that while repair or maintenance is not a manufacturing process, it is related to the manufacture of the final product, as malfunctioning machinery hinders manufacturing activity. The Tribunal held that welding electrodes used for repairs and maintenance are eligible for Cenvat Credit under the broader definition of &#039;input&#039; in Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 07:20:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 33 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257097</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to claim Cenvat Credit on welding electrodes used for repairs and maintenance of plant and machinery. The decision emphasized that while repair or maintenance is not a manufacturing process, it is related to the manufacture of the final product, as malfunctioning machinery hinders manufacturing activity. The Tribunal held that welding electrodes used for repairs and maintenance are eligible for Cenvat Credit under the broader definition of &#039;input&#039; in Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>