https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257085 An alleged wrongful withholding of payment and articles was held not to be a continuing offence, so limitation ran from the date the breach was complete and the complaint was time-barred. A second criminal complaint on the same facts was found impermissible because earlier complaints had already been decided on merits, the related claim had been rejected in arbitration, and the later filing was treated as abuse of process in a civil-arbitral dispute. The summons were also unsustainable because process had been issued without the mandatory inquiry required under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an accused residing outside jurisdiction, and the proceedings were quashed. en-us Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257085 An alleged wrongful withholding of payment and articles was held not to be a continuing offence, so limitation ran from the date the breach was complete and the complaint was time-barred. A second criminal complaint on the same facts was found impermissible because earlier complaints had already been decided on merits, the related claim had been rejected in arbitration, and the later filing was treated as abuse of process in a civil-arbitral dispute. The summons were also unsustainable because process had been issued without the mandatory inquiry required under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an accused residing outside jurisdiction, and the proceedings were quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257085